[Salon] The War Room





The War Room

The best of The Economist’s defence coverage




Anton La Guardia
Diplomatic editor

To travel with America’s secretary of defence, as I have been doing this week, is to behold the might of America’s armed forces. Lloyd Austin flew to Asia on board the E-4B, aka the “Doomsday Plane”, a flying command post capable of overseeing a nuclear war. Its few windows have an embedded metal mesh that protects the plane from the electromagnetic pulse of a nuclear explosion. 

The converted Boeing 747 features large TV screens—we had non-stop American news channels across six split screens, a Godzilla movie and even a bit of the Olympics. It also includes a conference room, banks of computers, a miles-long antenna to communicate with submarines carrying ballistic missiles, a cabin for Mr Austin and hot-bunks for the crew. 

Over the Rockies and then over the Aleutian islands, the E-4B was met by air-refuelling tankers to keep it flying. Fifteen hours later, at Yokota air base in Japan, we were met by three Black Hawk helicopters. They lifted Mr Austin and his retinue to central Tokyo. An armoured car awaited him; we journalists were packed in a van about a dozen vehicles back, as white-gloved Japanese police escorted us past a knot of protesters opposed to America’s large military bases in Okinawa.

Rather than less American presence, however, Japan is getting a lot more of it. The big announcement in Tokyo was that America had decided to create, for the first time in decades, a full-fledged warfighting command in Japan. It is intended to match Japan’s new American-style joint command that will belatedly bring together air, sea, land and other forces. 

America and Japan announced plans to boost their military presence along Japan’s south-western islands, close to Taiwan. And nearly 80 years after America dropped the atomic bomb over Hiroshima, Japan is asking for, and getting, stronger reassurances of America’s readiness to defend Japan with nuclear weapons.

Another milestone in Tokyo was the formalisation of the nascent three-way partnership between America, Japan and South Korea. Shin Won-sik was the first South Korean defence minister to make an official visit to Japan in 15 years; he attended the first trilateral meeting to be hosted there. 

After Tokyo we flew to Manila, where America is set to announce a big push to strengthen the Philippines’ armed forces as they face growing pressure from China in disputed parts of the South China Sea. The package will include $500m in military aid and a further $128m to upgrade the so-called EDCA sites—Philippine bases to which American forces now have access for “rotational” forces. This is not a return to the days when America had a large permanent military presence in its former colony. But Mr Austin’s expected appearance in Subic Bay, a former American naval base, is a clear signal to China. 

In Tokyo and Manila, Mr Austin was joined by Antony Blinken, the secretary of state, for so-called 2+2 meetings (of foreign and defence ministers); a further 2+2 is planned with Australia in Annapolis soon. In short, America has been busy reinforcing its presence along the “first island chain” that girdles China, and beyond. Indeed, American officials talk of these being “the ten most consequential days” for American defence policy in the Indo-Pacific under President Joe Biden. 

Yet the question on everyone’s mind, as America’s presidential election approaches, is whether all this effort will all be undone if Donald Trump is elected president. Messrs Blinken and Austin insist that strengthening deterrence in the Indo-Pacific has a strong bipartisan support, but uncertainty abounds.

The other big unspoken question is Taiwan. The self-governing island, which China claims as its own, is the likeliest cause of war between America and China. But it is hard to talk about in public because Taiwan, a thriving democracy that almost all countries refuse to recognise as a state, inhabits a diplomatic twilight zone. So America will not say whether the new headquarters in Japan would oversee a future fight over Taiwan. None of the allies will speak about what they might do in such a war. But everyone knows that, if China succeeds in invading Taiwan, the island-chain strategy will be broken. Some talk of Taiwan as the “cork in the bottle”.

Strategists speak of the “tyranny of distance” in the Pacific. As Mr Austin prepared to return to America, all aboard the E4-B will feel it in the form of jet lag that lingers for days. There is another realisation, too. Preserving America’s military power at a time of deepening rivalry with China, Russia, North Korea and Iran will require a lot more spending on defence, as a bipartisan report to Congress made clear this week. Indeed, look closely at the E-4B and it is showing its age (ditto the tankers that support it). Dating from the 1970s and 80s, it regularly breaks down, so a back-up C-17 is often on hand to convey Mr Austin’s party. The carpets are threadbare. The tray tables are creaky. The toilets sometimes block up. For reasons large and small, then, pray that American power in the Pacific is never seriously tested.



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.